Danuta Czech’s Auschwitz Chronicle is a reference book for the history of Auschwitz. Mattogno has compiled a long list of misrepresentations, outright lies and deceptions contained in it. This mega-fraud needs to be retired from the ranks of Auschwitz sources.
3rd edition (2022): Raul Hilberg’s major work The Destruction of European Jewry is generally considered the standard work on the Holocaust. Jürgen Graf applies the methods of critical analysis to Hilberg’s evidence and examines the results in the light of Revisionist historiography. The results of Graf’s critical analysis are devastating for Hilberg.
Researchers from the Auschwitz Museum tried to prove the reality of mass extermination by pointing to documents about deliveries of wood and coke as well as Zyklon B to the Auschwitz Camp. If put into the actual historical and technical context, however, as is done by this study, these documents prove the exact opposite of what those orthodox researchers claim.
Raul Hilberg’s magnum opus The Destruction of the European Jews is an orthodox standard work on the Holocaust. But how does Hilberg support his thesis that Jews were murdered en masse? He rips documents out of their context, distorts their content, misinterprets their meaning, and ignores entire archives. He only refers to “useful” witnesses, quotes fragments out of context, and conceals the fact that his witnesses are lying through their teeth. Lies and deceits permeate Hilberg’s book.
The Auschwitz Museum is a mendacious organization, lying about the true nature of the Auschwitz camp both to millions of tourists – most egregious with manipulations to its main exhibit, the ‘Old Krematorium’ in the Auschwitz Main Camp – and to serious scholars – by way of obfuscating the true nature and meaning of documents in its archives. Here is the proof.
A large number of orders issued by the Auschwitz camp headquarters have been preserved. They reveal the true nature of the camp. There is not a trace in these orders pointing at anything sinister going on in this camp. Quite to the contrary, many orders are in clear and insurmountable contradiction to claims that prisoners were mass murdered.] A large number of all the orders ever issued by the various commanders of the infamous Auschwitz Camp have been preserved. They reveal the true nature of the camp with all its daily events. There is not a trace in these orders pointing at anything sinister going on in this camp. Quite to the contrary, many orders are in clear and insurmountable contradiction to claims that prisoners were mass murdered. This is a selection of the most pertinent of these orders together with comments putting them into their proper historical context.
Robert van Pelt is considered one of the most prominent experts on Auschwitz. In The Real Case for Auschwitz, Mattogno analyzes the evidence proffered by van Pelt. He shows that van Pelt misrepresents and misinterprets all of the evidence he adduces. This book is of prime political and scholarly importance.
Pressac’s 1989 book was a trail blazer. Its many document reproductions are still valuable, but after decades of additional research, Pressac’s annotations are outdated. This book serves as an update and correction to Pressac’s epic tome, whether you own an original, read it online, borrow it from a library or purchase a reprint hopefully soon on sale…
2nd edition: Lipstadt’s “Denying the Holocaust” is the most pitiful book ever written against revisionism. But since academia and mainstream media keep pushing it, and because a “new” edition was released in late 2016, a thorough exposure of her incompetence and mendacity was overdue.
With great fanfare, a new book was announce in early 2016, the ultimate refutation of “Holocaust denial.” But as Mattogno’s book shows, it was all only hot air, for the authors don’t discuss, let alone refute a single serious revisionist work…
In their book “Denying History,” Shermer and Grobman, who claim to refute “Holocaust deniers,” completely ignored the vast amount of scholarly revisionist studies. Instead, they falsified, contorted and misinterpreted the historical record.